StratistProWe help finance and operations leaders find where data, reporting, and decisions break—then build the system that fixes it.
Surface exceptions before they become an executive reporting surprise.
Separate preparation, review, and rework to find avoidable effort.
Make logic, evidence, and ownership repeatable instead of person-dependent.
Example: identify why billing and payment exports fail to tie.
Example: standardize reconciliation logic and exception ownership.
Example: turn recurring revenue analysis into a maintained reporting system.
Enterprise revenue anomalies were hard to detect in manual recurring reporting. Python- and SQL-supported analysis brought together account-level information and translated exceptions into recurring executive reporting.
Supports the decision: is this reporting process expensive enough to justify repair or build? Example assumptions are visible and editable in the tool.
Start with the evidence, define the decision, and scope only the work that earns its place.
Start with the problem. Scope only what earns its place.
Use this when: something is wrong but you cannot prove where, why, or how much it matters.
Example: billing and payments do not tie.
Typical pace: 3–5 days.
Root cause & evidence map
Risk quantification
Recommended next moves
Use this when: the failure is known and the workflow, data, or control needs repair.
Example: recurring exceptions have no owner.
Typical pace: 1–3 weeks.
Reconciled analysis
Workflow & control fixes
Validation summary
Use this when: a decision repeats often enough to become a maintained tool.
Example: monthly performance analysis depends on fragile files.
Typical pace: 3–8 weeks.
Configured decision system
System documentation
Training & handoff
Four diagnostics. Runs locally in your browser. Inputs and uploaded file data never leave this page.
Check structure, completeness, duplicates, and field readiness.
Estimate the annual cost of a reporting process, then model a reduction scenario and payback.
Match two ledgers or exports on a shared key and surface exceptions within tolerance.
Map a process step-by-step, then rank the bottlenecks by wait, touch, rework and handoff.
| ID | Class | Severity | Key | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ e.id }} | {{ e.classification }} | {{ e.severity }} | {{ e.key }} | {{ e.evidence }} |
| Rank | Step | Score | Wait | Touch | Improvement question |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| {{ b.rank }} | {{ b.step }} | {{ b.bottleneckScore }} | {{ b.waitTime }} | {{ b.touchTime }} | {{ b.improvementQuestion }} |
{{ toolMethodology }}
Analytical output from the data and tolerances you supplied. Not an audit, review, or attestation. Validate before financial, billing, or legal action.
Decision-ready reporting with visible inputs, logic, assumptions, and ownership—not decorative dashboards.
{{ fam.answers }}
{{ fam.inputs }}
{{ fam.output }}
{{ fam.answers }}
{{ fam.inputs }}
{{ fam.output }}
Analysis, financial reporting and operational improvements delivered inside complex organizations.
{{ workFeatured.similarity }}
{{ workFeatured.workCompleted }}
{{ workFeatured.methodsText }}
{{ work.problem }}
Result{{ work.result }}
{{ work.similarity }}
{{ work.workCompleted }}
{{ work.methodsText }}
Short, evidence-based notes on the problems finance and operations leaders bring us. No hype, no invented claims.
When two systems record the same transaction differently — a rounding rule here, a timing cut-off there — totals drift apart. The fix is rarely a bigger spreadsheet. It is an explicit key, a defined tolerance, and a repeatable match, so the same inputs always produce the same result and every exception has a reason.
Most reporting cost is not the report itself; it is the preparation, the review cycles, and the rework when a number looks wrong. Measuring prep hours, review hours, and rework rate separately shows which part is worth automating — and which is cheaper to leave alone.
A process feels slow because of the gaps between steps, not the steps themselves. When wait time dwarfs touch time, the constraint is a handoff or an approval, not effort. Mapping wait, touch, rework, and handoffs step-by-step points to the one change that shortens the cycle.
Before building any system, it helps to know whether the data can support it: how complete the key fields are, whether records are unique, and whether formats are consistent. A readiness check turns "the data is messy" into a specific, fixable list.
Starting prices establish the lane. A written scope defines deliverables, assumptions, timeline, and fixed price before work begins.
✓ No automatic charge. No surprise expansion.
Where data, operations, finance, and decisions stop agreeing.
Messy inputs become a clear problem with evidence you can inspect.
Ordered evidence becomes defensible reasoning and a decision criterion.
Working output your team can use, understand, and maintain.
We take on a limited number of projects at a time so the work stays focused.
✓ Problems cross teams
✓ Numbers do not reconcile
✓ A repeated decision needs structure
✓ Existing tools create more work
× Staff augmentation
× Vague transformation theater
× Advice without implementation
× Work requiring invented proof
Tell us what you are trying to figure out. A person reviews every inquiry. This is not an upload — share files later, only through an agreed secure process.
A person will review it. Receiving your inquiry is not a proposal, a price, a timeline, or a commitment to take on the work.
Free diagnostics process files locally. Project submissions send only the written brief you review. Request deletion by ordinary email after submission.
Do not send confidential files by ordinary email. Use the agreed secure follow-up process after scope and handling terms are confirmed. Files remain yours.
Work begins after written scope, acceptance criteria, explicit authorization and payment terms are agreed. No automatic charging or surprise expansion.
Only name, work email, problem, and timeline are required. Skip anything you do not know yet.
No file upload is used here. Secure follow-up is arranged only after review.
{{ intakeReview }}
{{ intakeSuccess }}
{{ intakeFooterNote }}
StratistPro
StratistPro turns messy spreadsheets and disconnected exports into reliable reports, clearer decisions, and tools your team can use every day.
Built for finance and operations teams relying on spreadsheets, manual reports, and disconnected systems.
Two diagnostics live now, four more in development — real tools that run in your browser, nothing uploaded, nothing stored. See the quality before you start a project.
Every project combines analysis, financial discipline and software — so the work ends with something your team can use, not a recommendation you still have to build. Start with a free diagnostic, or describe your project for a fixed-price quote.
Run a free diagnostic on your own data. Your file stays in your browser, and your results export as a professional report.
{{ soonTool.desc }}
Choose the report your business needs. Each one is a live workbook — edit the blue input cells, watch the formulas and charts recalculate, then export to PDF or Excel. Everything runs locally in your browser.
Artifact-backed internal, prototype, in-development, and independent-product records only. No implied client outcomes.
Start with a free tool and see where your gaps are. If you want us to fix them, tell us what's leaking and where the data lives.
Start with a free diagnostic to identify the problem. Custom projects are then quoted at a fixed price based on the data, deliverables and systems involved — so you know the cost before work begins.
{{ q.a }}
Run a free tool, or just describe the problem. We'll come back with a straight answer on whether we can fix it — and what it costs.
StratistPro investigates the problem like an analyst, verifies the numbers like a financial operator, and builds the software that makes the solution repeatable — so the engagement ends with something your team can run, not a slide deck.
Tell us what you're trying to solve, what you have to work with, and what's currently breaking. We'll reply with a clear next step.